no, unfortunately, that is not automatically possible. You will need to stlye the cells with “Custom CSS”, see the FAQ for examples.

Regarding the problem with the DataTables library: This could have several reasons, I suggest that you open a thread in the WordPress support forums, with more information.

Regards,
Tobias

otherwise, DataTables do not work .. sort or filter

thanks for your comment. Unfortunately, I don’t really understand what you want to achieve. Whom do you want to keep from adding rows? And what do you mean with “put him in another cell the new word”? Can you please explain this a little more, maybe with an example?

Thanks,
Tobias

great! Having the plugin search “.mp3″ or “.MP3″ can be achieved with another small change. In the same file, change line 34 to

$regex = "#(<a>]*?)\.mp3(.*?)#is";

(notice the added “i” near the end of the line). That tells the plugin to ignore whether the text is upper or lower case. So, it would even find “.mP3″.

Best wishes,
Tobias

thanks for your question.

This happens, because the “MP3 Scraper” calls it’s conversion process too early. It does not wait for Shortcodes to be evaluated, but tries to replace links to mp3s before that (but then the table HTML does not yet exist)…
To make this work, I suggest to modify line 10 of the mp3-scraper.php file to

add_filter( 'the_content' , 'mp3Scrape', 12 );

so that the function runs after Shortcodes have been processed.

Best wishes,
Tobias

Thank you so much for your plugin! I use your plugin heavily to organize mp3 downloads tables. I was hoping to allow an additional plugin, “MP3 Scraper By Jordan Andree • Skorin”, to scan your tables and convert my linked mp3s into a little flash player button. This plugin can scan and convert mp3 links within WordPress and hard coded HTML tables. However, it is unable to convert my linked mp3 from WP-Table Reloaded tables. Can you point me in the right direction to get this to work?

thanks! Good point again. You again found something that I didn’t think about :-)
I’ll add this in the next version.

Best wishes,
Tobias

I have just discovered another search anomaly with which I hope can be as easily solved (if it is something that is of interest). Search results are possible from the table contents, but not the table name or description.

Thank you, Canon.